Virtual and Phone consultations available in all cases.

Schedule Your Consultation Now

Avvo Rating
Expertise
OCBA
State Bar of California
Featured in huffpost Live
Best Attorney
Top Rated Lawyer
Lawyers
Greater Irvine Chamber
Iranian American Chamber of Commerce
2022 Winner Woman-Owned Small Business Award
Winner 2022 Woman-Owned Small Business Award
The National Top 100 Trial Lawyers
America's Top 50 Lawyers 2023
Handel on the Law Premier Attorney Directory

What to Expect During a Trial in California Criminal Law

A criminal trial in California is a critical stage in the legal process, where the fate of the accused is determined based on evidence and legal arguments. Understanding what to expect during a trial can help defendants, witnesses, and even spectators navigate this often complex and intimidating experience. This article provides an in-depth look at the various stages of a criminal trial in California, highlighting what participants can expect and how they can best prepare.

Pre-Trial Preparation

Before the trial begins, both the prosecution and the defense engage in extensive preparation. This includes gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and formulating legal strategies. Defendants should work closely with their attorneys to understand the charges, review evidence, and practice their testimonies if they plan to testify.

Jury Selection

The first formal step in a trial is jury selection, also known as "voir dire." During this process, both the prosecution and the defense question potential jurors to determine their suitability for the case. The goal is to select an impartial jury that can fairly evaluate the evidence. Attorneys may dismiss potential jurors using "peremptory challenges" (no reason needed) or "challenges for cause" (specific reason provided).

Opening Statements

Once the jury is selected, the trial begins with opening statements. Both the prosecution and the defense have the opportunity to outline their cases to the jury. The prosecution goes first, providing an overview of the charges and the evidence they plan to present. The defense follows, offering a preview of their counterarguments and evidence. Opening statements are not evidence but serve to frame the case for the jury.

Presentation of Evidence

The core of the trial involves the presentation of evidence, where both sides introduce physical evidence, documents, and witness testimonies to support their case.

  1. Prosecution’s Case: The prosecution presents its evidence first, calling witnesses to testify and introducing physical evidence. Each witness undergoes direct examination by the prosecution, where they are asked questions that support the prosecution’s case. After direct examination, the defense has the opportunity to cross-examine the witness, challenging their credibility and testimony.
  2. Defense’s Case: After the prosecution rests, the defense presents its case. The defense may call witnesses and introduce evidence to refute the prosecution’s claims. Similar to the prosecution, the defense conducts direct examinations of their witnesses, followed by cross-examination from the prosecution. The defendant has the right to testify but is not required to do so. If the defendant chooses to testify, they will be subject to cross-examination.
Closing Arguments

Following the presentation of evidence, both sides make closing arguments. This is the final opportunity for the prosecution and the defense to summarize their cases and persuade the jury. The prosecution goes first, followed by the defense. The prosecution may then offer a rebuttal to address points made by the defense. Closing arguments are not evidence but are intended to help the jury interpret the evidence presented during the trial.

Jury Instructions

After closing arguments, the judge provides the jury with instructions on the legal standards they must apply when deliberating on the case. These instructions include definitions of the charges, the elements that must be proven for a conviction, and the burden of proof. In criminal cases, the prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt."

Jury Deliberation

The jury then retires to the deliberation room to discuss the case and reach a verdict. Deliberations are conducted in private, and jurors are not permitted to discuss the case with anyone outside the jury. The length of deliberation can vary significantly, from a few hours to several days, depending on the complexity of the case and the jury’s discussions.

Verdict

Once the jury reaches a decision, they return to the courtroom to announce the verdict. The foreperson, a juror selected to lead the deliberations, reads the verdict aloud. The jury can find the defendant "guilty" or "not guilty" on each charge. A unanimous verdict is required in criminal cases. If the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case may be retried with a new jury.

Post-Trial Proceedings

If the defendant is found not guilty, they are acquitted, and the case is concluded. If the defendant is found guilty, the case moves to the sentencing phase. During sentencing, the judge considers factors such as the severity of the crime, the defendant’s criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances. The judge then imposes a sentence, which may include imprisonment, fines, probation, or other penalties.

Conclusion

Understanding what to expect during a criminal trial in California can help defendants and their supporters navigate the legal process with greater confidence. Each stage of the trial, from jury selection to the verdict, plays a crucial role in ensuring that justice is served. By working closely with legal counsel and being well-prepared, defendants can better protect their rights and present a strong defense.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
The Johnson Law Group handled a very important and delicate matter with professionalism and a caring manner. Attorneys were knowledgeable, in communications, and provided a top notch service to my need. I highly recommend the Johnson Law Group for your important legal issues. Hardy Jr.
★★★★★
Lauren Johnson-Norris was amazing. She explained everything in ways that were easily understood, & answered all of my question. She was respectful, but also open & honest. She started work on my case the first day we met & got results quickly. She demonstrated passion, concern, and showed true feeling for my situation. My expectations were greatly exceeded. I would say she has an incredible attention for detail, & has a real dedication to her work. Lauren Johnson-Norris would be my first recommendation to any of my family or friends similarly in need of legal assistance. Heather
★★★★★
I researched a lot of attorneys and had met with two attorneys before speaking with Ms. Johnson-Norris and retaining her. I was facing serious charges that could not be on my record, due to my job and was really scared. I felt hopeless & thought my life was ruined...until I found Ms. Johnson-Norris… A criminal defense client (drug case)
★★★★★
She is on point. She knows her field well. I have to give credit where credit is due, you deserve it Lauren Johnson-Norris… Anonymous, Victim of Domestic Violence
★★★★★
Lauren Johnson-Norris was my saving grace. I naively thought you were innocent until proven guilty. However, I soon discovered that CPS and family court does not see things that way… Mrs. G, a CPS client