Close

Virtual and Phone consultations available in all cases.

Petty Theft vs. Grand Theft: Key Differences in California Law

In California, theft crimes are categorized based on the value of the stolen property and the circumstances surrounding the offense. Two primary categories are petty theft and grand theft, each with distinct legal definitions, penalties, and implications. Understanding the differences between these two types of theft is essential for navigating California’s criminal justice system, whether you’re a defendant, a victim, or simply seeking knowledge about the state’s legal framework. This article explores the key differences between petty theft and grand theft in California, including their legal definitions, penalties, and potential defenses.

Legal Definitions of Petty Theft and Grand Theft Petty Theft

Petty theft, also known as "misdemeanor theft," is defined under California Penal Code Section 484. It involves the unlawful taking of property valued at $950 or less. The essential elements of petty theft are:

  1. Unlawful Taking: The defendant must have taken or moved property without the owner’s consent.
  2. Intent: There must be an intent to permanently deprive the owner of their property.
  3. Value: The value of the stolen property must not exceed $950. This threshold applies to the total value of all stolen items if multiple items are taken.

Petty theft is generally considered a less severe offense compared to grand theft due to the lower value of the stolen property.

Grand Theft

Grand theft is defined under California Penal Code Sections 487 and 488. It involves the unlawful taking of property valued at more than $950. Grand theft can also be categorized into various types based on the circumstances:

  1. Grand Theft (General): Theft of property valued over $950 that does not fall into specific categories like vehicle theft or burglary.
  2. Grand Theft Auto: Theft of a motor vehicle, regardless of its value.
  3. Grand Theft from the Person: Theft involving the use of force or fear, such as robbery.

The key distinction between grand theft and petty theft is the value of the property involved and the potential for greater harm or risk to the victim.

Penalties for Petty Theft and Grand Theft Petty Theft Penalties

Petty theft is typically charged as a misdemeanor, but it can also be charged as a felony under certain circumstances, such as if the defendant has prior theft convictions or if the theft involved specific aggravating factors.

  • Misdemeanor Penalties: For a misdemeanor petty theft conviction, penalties can include:
    • Jail Time: Up to six months in county jail.
    • Fines: Up to $1,000.
    • Probation: Up to three years of probation, which may include conditions such as community service or restitution.
    • Restitution: Payment to the victim for the value of the stolen property or damages.
  • Felony Penalties: If charged as a felony, petty theft can result in:
    • Prison Time: Up to three years in state prison.
    • Fines: Increased fines, potentially exceeding $10,000.
    • Probation and Restitution: Similar to misdemeanor penalties but with more stringent terms.
Grand Theft Penalties

Grand theft is considered a more serious offense and can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances and prior criminal history.

  • Felony Penalties: For felony grand theft, penalties can include:
    • Prison Time: Two to three years in state prison, with the possibility of additional years for aggravating factors.
    • Fines: Up to $10,000.
    • Probation: Up to three years, with conditions similar to those for petty theft.
    • Restitution: Payment to the victim for the value of the stolen property or damages.
  • Misdemeanor Penalties: If charged as a misdemeanor, penalties can include:
    • Jail Time: Up to one year in county jail.
    • Fines: Up to $1,000.
    • Probation: Up to one year, with conditions such as community service or restitution.
Potential Defenses Defenses for Petty Theft and Grand Theft

Common defenses for both petty theft and grand theft include:

  1. Lack of Intent: Demonstrating that there was no intent to permanently deprive the owner of their property. For example, if the defendant believed the property was theirs or was merely borrowing it, this may negate the theft charge.
  2. Mistaken Identity: Proving that the defendant was not the person who committed the theft. This can involve providing alibi evidence or challenging the reliability of witness testimony.
  3. Consent: Showing that the property was taken with the owner’s consent. If the owner permitted the defendant to take the property, it does not constitute theft.
  4. 4. Insufficient Evidence: Challenging the prosecution’s evidence, such as the valuation of the stolen property or the connection between the defendant and the crime.
Broader Implications

The distinction between petty theft and grand theft has broader implications:

  • Criminal Record: Both offenses result in a criminal record, which can affect future employment, housing, and other aspects of life. Grand theft, due to its felony classification, often has more severe long-term consequences.
  • Social Stigma: Theft offenses carry social stigma, impacting relationships and community standing. The severity of the stigma can vary based on the classification of the offense.
Conclusion

Petty theft and grand theft represent different levels of theft offenses in California, with distinct legal definitions, penalties, and implications. While petty theft involves property valued at $950 or less, grand theft involves higher-value property or specific circumstances that elevate the offense. Understanding these differences is crucial for navigating legal proceedings and for individuals affected by theft crimes. Effective legal representation and a thorough understanding of the legal framework can help address the complexities of theft charges and work towards a fair resolution.


Practice Areas
Client Reviews
★★★★★
The Johnson Law Group handled a very important and delicate matter with professionalism and a caring manner. Attorneys were knowledgeable, in communications, and provided a top notch service to my need. I highly recommend the Johnson Law Group for your important legal issues. Hardy Jr.
★★★★★
Lauren Johnson-Norris was amazing. She explained everything in ways that were easily understood, & answered all of my question. She was respectful, but also open & honest. She started work on my case the first day we met & got results quickly. She demonstrated passion, concern, and showed true feeling for my situation. My expectations were greatly exceeded. I would say she has an incredible attention for detail, & has a real dedication to her work. Lauren Johnson-Norris would be my first recommendation to any of my family or friends similarly in need of legal assistance. Heather
★★★★★
I researched a lot of attorneys and had met with two attorneys before speaking with Ms. Johnson-Norris and retaining her. I was facing serious charges that could not be on my record, due to my job and was really scared. I felt hopeless & thought my life was ruined...until I found Ms. Johnson-Norris… A criminal defense client (drug case)
★★★★★
She is on point. She knows her field well. I have to give credit where credit is due, you deserve it Lauren Johnson-Norris… Anonymous, Victim of Domestic Violence
★★★★★
Lauren Johnson-Norris was my saving grace. I naively thought you were innocent until proven guilty. However, I soon discovered that CPS and family court does not see things that way… Mrs. G, a CPS client