HABLAMOS ESPAÑOL • AVAILABLE 24/7 • HELP WITH BAIL BONDS
(949) 785-5219 (949) 622-5522 Make a PaymentHABLAMOS ESPAÑOL • AVAILABLE 24/7 • HELP WITH BAIL BONDS
(949) 785-5219 (949) 622-5522 Make a Payment
Juvenile dependency court orders can have a major impact on custody, visitation, and family reunification. Although these orders are legally binding, some can be changed when new evidence emerges or circumstances materially improve.
If you believe an earlier order should be reconsidered, California law provides a procedure known as a 388 petition.
A successful petition requires more than disagreement with the judge’s original decision. You must identify a legally sufficient reason for the change and explain why the requested modification would benefit the child.
Under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388, a parent, child, or other qualifying interested person may ask the juvenile court to change, modify, or set aside an earlier order based on changed circumstances or new evidence.
The correct document is the JV-180 Request to Change Court Order, not JV-190 or a “399 petition form.”
The official form is available from the California Courts.
Depending on the circumstances, a petition may request:
The petition should identify the previous order, the new facts, and the specific change requested.
After the petition is filed, the court first determines whether it presents sufficient facts to justify further consideration.
The judge may deny a petition without a hearing if it fails to make the required initial showing of changed circumstances or new evidence and potential benefit to the child.
If the court does not deny the petition at that stage, California Rule of Court 5.570 provides procedures for scheduling a hearing or deciding whether an evidentiary hearing is warranted.
An evidentiary hearing, when granted, generally must take place within 30 calendar days after filing. Filing a petition does not guarantee a full hearing.
At the hearing, the parties may present declarations, records, or witness testimony as permitted by the court.
The person requesting the change generally carries the burden of proof. The applicable evidentiary standard depends on the type of order being modified.
The judge may grant, modify, or deny the requested relief.
The key is showing both a meaningful change and why the proposed order would serve the child’s best interests.
For example, a parent whose child was removed because of unsafe substance use may submit evidence demonstrating sustained recovery and improved parenting circumstances.
Useful evidence may include:
However, completing treatment alone does not guarantee that the child will return home.
The court considers whether the changed circumstances are sufficiently established and whether modifying the order would benefit the child.
An attorney can help prepare the petition, organize supporting evidence, identify the appropriate legal standard, and prepare for possible questioning.
In some circumstances, yes.
A parent may seek modification of an existing order before parental rights have been terminated, including after reunification services end.
However, the child’s need for stability and permanence becomes increasingly important as the case advances.
A petition filed close to a permanency hearing should present concrete evidence of changed circumstances and explain why the requested modification would promote the child’s welfare.
A standard 388 petition should not be treated as a guaranteed way to regain custody after parental rights have been terminated. Separate statutory procedures and restrictions may apply.
Similarly, an ordinary dependency modification petition is not a general method of undoing an adoption that has already been finalized.
Use California Judicial Council Form JV-180, Request to Change Court Order.
No. The court may deny a petition without a full hearing if it does not make the required initial showing.
If an evidentiary hearing is granted under Rule 5.570, it generally must be held within 30 calendar days after the petition is filed.
Yes. Visitation orders may be modified when the statutory requirements are satisfied.
No. The court must also determine whether the requested change is supported by the evidence and would promote the child’s best interests.
A 388 petition can provide an opportunity to ask the juvenile court to reconsider an existing order when circumstances have changed. The petition must be carefully prepared, supported by evidence, and focused on the child’s welfare.
Johnson Criminal Law Group represents parents in Irvine and throughout Orange County in juvenile dependency matters. An Irvine juvenile dependency lawyer can review the original order, assess whether section 388 applies, and help prepare a request for modification.
